CDP 2025-0042 (DEV2025-0035)– 2479 OCEAN ST
Summary
SCH Number
2026050220
Public Agency
City of Carlsbad
Document Title
CDP 2025-0042 (DEV2025-0035)– 2479 OCEAN ST
Document Type
NOE - Notice of Exemption
Received
Posted
5/6/2026
Document Description
Minor Coastal Development Permit for improvements to an existing 30-foot-tall, two-story, 5,588-square-foot single family dwelling with a 509-square-foot attached garage, a 485-square-foot attached garage, upper and lower-level attached decks and a pool and spa. Earthwork will consist of cut and export of 11.55 cubic yards of material. The proposal includes the following:
• Demolish the existing curved patio wall and planter on the lower level.
• Demolish existing entry architectural feature, gate and steps at the front courtyard entrance.
• Refinish, repair and re-grade the existing lower and upper-level balcony waterproofing surfaces with new waterproofing in order to alleviate water ponding issues.
• Replace existing glass balcony railing on lower and upper-level balconies with a new 42"-high structural glass railing
• Square out and extend existing lower-level patio deck 84 square feet
• Trim back existing upper-level deck
• Demolish existing architectural corbel and arch features
• New architectural buildouts at rear and front of the structure
• New front entry steps
• New water feature at front entry
Contact Information
Name
Scott Estacion
Agency Name
APPLICANT
Job Title
APPLICANT
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Phone
Name
LAUREN YZAGUIRRE
Agency Name
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION
Job Title
SENIOR PLANNER
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Carlsbad
Counties
San Diego
Regions
Southern California
Parcel #
203-021-04-00
Other Location Info
2479 Ocean Street
Notice of Exemption
Exempt Status
Categorical Exemption
Type, Section or Code
Class 1, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)
Reasons for Exemption
CEQA Section 15301 allows for the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The project development consists of maintenance and exterior alterations to an existing single-family dwelling. The project proposes alterations to an existing single-family dwelling, including but not limited to, demolishing the existing curved patio wall and planter on the lower level, constructing an 84-square-foot deck expansion, trimming back existing upper-level deck, and constructing new exterior stairs and water feature at building entrance. The proposed changes are minor in nature and will result in negligible expansions of the existing residential use.
Exceptions to Exemptions
CEQA Section 15300.2 – Exceptions
Planning staff evaluated all the potential exceptions to the use of Categorical Exemptions for the proposed
project (in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2) and determined that none of these
exceptions apply as explained below:
a. Location. “Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.”
Response: CEQA Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) is a Class 1 Exemption. Class 1 categorical exemptions are not subject to this exception.
b. Cumulative Impact. “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.”
Response: There is no evidence of successive similar projects in the area that would result in cumulative environmental impacts. The Project proposes exterior modifications to an existing single-family residence including a second-level deck expansion on a previously developed lot that is consistent with the city’s General Plan land use and zoning designation for the site. The project will not contribute to cumulative impacts related to air quality, noise, transportation, or other environmental concerns. Therefore, this exception does not apply.
c. Significant Effect. “A categorical exemption shall not be used for any activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.”
Response: There are no unusual circumstances that would have a significant impact on the environment due to the Project. The Project does not involve any unusual circumstances. In regard to biological resources, the Project is not located within an existing or proposed Hardline Conservation Area or Standards Area of the City of Carlsbad’s Habitat Management Plan (HMP).
d. Scenic Highway. “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.”
Response: The area of proposed development is not located within the view shed of a state scenic highway or any state highway that is designated as eligible for listing as a scenic highway. The project site is surrounded to the north, east and south by existing residential structures. Therefore, implementation of the Project will result in similar visual conditions compared with a no project scenario.
e. Hazardous Waste Site. “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.”
Response: The project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substance Site (CORTESE) List.
f. Historical Resources. “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.”
Response: The project site is not listed on any local, state, or federal register of historic resources, nor has it been identified as potentially eligible. The project site is currently developed with a single-family home constructed in 1981. Pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Carlsbad tribal, Cultural and Paleontological Resources Guidelines, buildings, structures, and facilities less than 45 years old at the time of study are exempt from evaluation as modern resources, unless determined to be of exceptional significance and meet Criterion Consideration (g) of the NRHP (A property achieving significance within the past 50 years) and is thereby subject to the guidance in National Register Bulletin 22. There is nothing that suggests the existing building has achieved significance pursuant to National Register Bulletin 22. Therefore, the project will not result in a substantial adverse change to any historical resource, and this exception does not apply. As such, development of the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and this exception does not apply.
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.070(C) - Exceptions
Exceptions. Even though a project may otherwise be eligible for an exemption, no exemption shall apply in the following circumstances:
1. Grading and clearing activities affecting sensitive plant or animal habitats, which disturb, fragment or remove such areas as defined by either the California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code Sections 2050 et seq.), or the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Section 15131 et seq.); sensitive, rare, candidate species of special concern; endangered or threatened biological species or their habitat (specifically including sage scrub habitat for the California Gnatcatcher); or archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods;
Or
2. Parcel maps, plot plans and all discretionary development projects otherwise exempt but which affect sensitive, threatened, or endangered biological species or their habitat (as defined above), archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods, wetlands, stream courses designated on U.S. Geological Survey maps, hazardous materials, unstable soils, or other factors requiring special review, on all or a portion of the site. (Ord. NS-593, 2001)
Response: The Project site is located in an established and developed part of the city and is surrounded to the north, east and south by residential uses. The Project site has been previously graded and developed with a single-family home, attached garage, pool, concrete hardscape and ornamental landscape which has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Furthermore, the site is not located within mapped areas of potential critical habitat as depicted in the City’s General Plan.
Furthermore, based on the limited amount of grading proposed (11.5 cubic yards (cy) of cut and export), the likelihood that intact archaeological or cultural resources exist on the Project site is low due to the previous site disturbance. Therefore, earth-moving activities associated with the Project would not affect archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods.
Hazardous materials, unstable soils or other factors requiring special review do not apply or are not found within this project location.
County Clerk
San Diego
Attachments
Notice of Exemption
Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit LCI’s Accessibility Site.
