CUP 2025-0004 (DEV2025-0040) – 2045 Corte Del Nogal Pickleball

2026020968

City of Carlsbad

NOE - Notice of Exemption

2/25/2026

2/25/2026

LAUREN YZAGUIRRE

CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION

SENIOR PLANNER

Lead/Public Agency

1635 FARADAY AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008

(442) 339-2634

LAUREN.YZAGUIRRE@carlsbadca.gov

ANDREW SLIPKA

PICKLEBALL REPUBLIC

APPLICANT

Project Applicant

7105 CORINTIA ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92009

(510) 816-6869

ASLIPKA@GMAIL.COM

213-061-09-00

2045 Corte Del Nogal, Carlsbad, CA 92011 (APN 213-061-09-00)

Categorical Exemption

Class 32, Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects)

The project is consistent with the general plan as well as the zoning ordinance in terms of land use, and development standards. The site is subject to the PI, Planned Industrial General Plan Land Use Designation and is Zoned Planned Industrial (P-M). The project is within the city limits, is less than five acres in size, and is within an existing industrial park, surrounded on all four sides by urban uses including offices, and warehouses. Because the site contains only non-native and ornamental vegetation, the site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic (as verified by the Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Assessment prepared by LOS Engineering, Inc., Justin Rasas, P.E., dated January 7, 2026, Exhibit 1 ), noise (as verified by the Noise Assessment, Ldn Consulting, Inc., Jeremy Louden, November 3, 2025, Exhibit ), air quality, or water quality. Finally, the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Project would pay the required Public Facility Fee, traffic impact fees and water and sewer connection fees to help offset the Project’s cumulative impact and help fund the public infrastructure and services necessary to accommodate the intensification of use. Exceptions to Exemptions CEQA Section 15300.2 – Exceptions Planning staff evaluated all the potential exceptions to the use of Categorical Exemptions for the proposed project (in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2) and determined that none of these exceptions apply as explained below: a. Location. “Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.” Response – The location exception is not applicable to Class 32 Exemptions for In-Fill Development Projects. b. Cumulative Impact - “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.” Response – There is no evidence to conclude that significant impacts will occur based on past project approvals or that the proposed Project's impacts are cumulatively considerable when evaluating any cumulative impacts associated with construction air quality, noise, transportation, or water quality in the area surrounding the proposed Project. Accordingly, the Project’s incremental impacts, when considered together with the impacts of the related projects, would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact. The Project, and all future projects, will be required to comply with all applicable local, regional, and state laws, regulations, and guidelines, and as described above, any potential impact cause by the Project’s construction and operation would continue to be less than significant and would not contribute significantly to regional cumulative impact in the broader project region. Therefore, this exception does not apply. c. Significant Effect - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for any activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” Response – The project involves the change of use from a warehouse to an indoor and outdoor pickleball facility for an existing industrial building. 13 courts will be located indoors while only two courts will be located outdoors within the existing parking lot. The noise assessment completed for the project (Pickleball Republic Pickleball Facility Operational Noise Assessment, Ldn Consulting, Inc., Jeremy Louden, November 3, 2025) concluded that the operational noise levels anticipated for the project at the property line will not exceed 65 Ldn, as required per the performance standards established in Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) section 21.34.090. The project is also not anticipated to increase noise levels within the interior of the existing buildings to the north, south and west above performance standards due to site topography, building locations and building code standards. In addition, the closest sensitive receptors, multi-family residences, are located over 1,500 square feet away from the project site and will not be impacted by noise. Therefore, the project is not expected to have any noise impacts. There are no unusual circumstances that would have a significant impact on the environment due to the Project. The Project does not involve any unusual circumstances. d. Scenic Highway - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.” Response – Corte Deal Nogal and Corte Del Abeto are not considered historical and scenic corridors throughout Carlsbad, are not highways officially designated as a State Scenic Highway, nor is the project visible from a Carlsbad historical or scenic corridor or State Scenic Highway. The project site is also surrounded on all sides by existing offices and industrial structures. The majority of the operations will occur indoor and the two outdoor pickleball courts will not significantly affect the visual conditions compared with a no project scenario. e. Hazardous Waste Site - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Response – The Project site is not identified on the Department of Toxic Substance Control geoportal map as a Cleanup, Hazardous Waste, or Inspection site. Furthermore, there is no indication that the site has had any previous uses associated with hazardous materials, such as dry-cleaning or gas station. f. Historical Resources - “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Response – The existing 35,407-square-foot industrial warehouse building on the property was constructed in 1987. As the structure is less than 50 years old, the structure is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs, nor is it eligible for listing in the Local Register. As such, development of the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and this exception does not apply. The property is not known to have any other special circumstances that would make the property a historic resource. Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.070(B) - Exceptions Exceptions. Even though a project may otherwise be eligible for an exemption, no exemption shall apply in the following circumstances: 1. Grading and clearing activities affecting sensitive plant or animal habitats, which disturb, fragment or remove such areas as defined by either the California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code Sections 2050 et seq.), or the Federal Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. Section 15131 et seq.); sensitive, rare, candidate species of special concern; endangered or threatened biological species or their habitat (specifically including sage scrub habitat for the California Gnatcatcher); or archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods; Or 2. Parcel maps, plot plans and all discretionary development projects otherwise exempt but which affect sensitive, threatened, or endangered biological species or their habitat (as defined above), archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods, wetlands, stream courses designated on U.S. Geological Survey maps, hazardous materials, unstable soils, or other factors requiring special review, on all or a portion of the site. (Ord. NS-593, 2001) Response – The Project site is located in a developed part of the city and is surrounded by office and industrial uses. The Project site contains an existing building, parking lot and landscaping, and contains only non-natives and ornamental vegetation with no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Furthermore, the site is not within mapped areas of potential critical habitat as depicted in the City’s General Plan. The existing 35,407-square-foot industrial warehouse building on the property was constructed in 1987. As the structure is less than 50 years old, the structure is not listed or eligible to be listed in any national, state, or local landmark or historic district programs. As such, development of the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Furthermore, no grading is proposed with the project and the likelihood that intact archaeological or cultural resources exist on the Project site is low due to previous site disturbance. The Project would not affect archaeological or cultural resources from either historic or prehistoric periods, as there are no earth-moving activities associated with the Project. Hazardous materials, unstable soils or other factors requiring special review do not apply or are not found within this project location.