Beneficial Use of Dredged Sediment for Wetland Restoration in San Francisco Bay
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2024020498
Lead Agency
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region 2
(RWQCB)
Document Title
Beneficial Use of Dredged Sediment for Wetland Restoration in San Francisco Bay
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/7/2026
Document Description
Notice of Determination for Coastal Conservancy approval of grant funding. The Coastal Conservancy will enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in which the Conservancy is the non-federal sponsor for the Corps’s placement of dredged sediment from federal dredging projects at wetland restorations sites on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay, such as Cullinan Ranch, Montezuma, Hamilton Bel Marin Keys, and/or Eden Landing in Alameda, Solano, and Marin counties.
Contact Information
Name
Vanessa Aczon
Agency Name
California State Coastal Conservancy
Job Title
Project Manager
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Counties
Alameda, Marin, Solano
Regions
Northern California, San Francisco Bay Area
Other Location Info
Cullinan Ranch, Montezuma, Eden Landing, and Hamilton-Bel Marin Keys wetland restoration sites on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay in Alameda, Solano, and Marin counties
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Coastal Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes