OAKLAND HARBOR TURNING BASINS WIDENING

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2022050647
Lead Agency
Port of Oakland
Document Title
OAKLAND HARBOR TURNING BASINS WIDENING
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/11/2025
Document Description
The proposed Oakland Harbor Turning Basins Widening Project involves widening the turning basins at the Oakland Seaport (Seaport). The turning basin in the Seaport’s inner harbor would be widened by 334 feet, from its current diameter of 1,500 feet to 1,834 feet and would require dredging and removal of landside property along the shoreline at the Seaport in the City of Oakland and along the shoreline in the City of Alameda. The turning basin in the Seaport’s outer harbor would be widened by 315 feet, from its current diameter of 1,650 feet to 1,965 feet; widening the turning basin in the outer harbor would be conducted via dredging.

Contact Information

Name
Khamly Chuop
Agency Name
Port of Oakland
Job Title
Port Associate Environmental Planner/Scientist
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Alameda, Oakland
Counties
Alameda
Regions
San Francisco Bay Area
Zip
94607/9450
Total Acres
25
Railways
UPRR, BNSF
Schools
Ruby Bridges, Lincoln,Prescott
Waterways
San Francisco Bay

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Port of Oakland
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Alameda
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://www.oaklandseaport.com/turning-basin-widening-environmental-planning and Port of Oakland, 530 Water Street, Oakland, California 94607

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Attachments

Download CSV Download All Attachments New Search Print