Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Desert Valley Company Monofill Facility, SWIS Number 13-AA-0022
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019120605
Lead Agency
Imperial County
Document Title
Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Desert Valley Company Monofill Facility, SWIS Number 13-AA-0022
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/31/2025
Document Description
The proposed SWFP will allow for the following: changing the facility name from Monofill Facility to Desert Valley Company Monofill Facility; increasing the permitted disposal acreage from 28.9 acres to 62 acres; removal of reference to the remaining capacity and including the design capacity; increasing the design capacity from 1,839,900 cubic yards to 4,370,900 cubic yards; increasing the maximum elevation from -59 feet mean sea level (ft. MSL) to -55 ft. MSL; and increasing the estimated closure year from January 2025 to 2053.
Contact Information
Name
Gina Weber
Agency Name
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Imperial
Regions
Countywide
Other Location Info
3301 W. Highway 86 Brawley, CA 92227
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Imperial
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://secure.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWISDocument/Document
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No