Sugarloaf Mountain Trail Culvert (Streambed Alteration Agreement EPIMS Notification No. NEV-56209-R2)
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019079005
Lead Agency
City of Nevada City
Document Title
Sugarloaf Mountain Trail Culvert (Streambed Alteration Agreement EPIMS Notification No. NEV-56209-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/26/2025
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed
Streambed Alteration Agreement EPIMS Notification Number NEV-56209-R2, pursuant to
section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, City of Nevada City (City).
The project is limited to the installation of a new 12-foot-long culvert with 24-inch diameter and
6-feet of rock slope protection at the inlet and outlet in a small unnamed intermittent stream.
The installation of these drainage components will require the removal of Himalayan blackberry
shrubs. The project is part of an initiative to construct an approximately 1-mile-long multi-use
trail on the northern flank of Sugarloaf Mountain, from the North Bloomfield Road and State
Highway 49 intersection to the existing access road near the top of the mountain.
Contact Information
Name
Dawn Zydonis
Agency Name
City of Nevada City
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Samantha Morford
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Nevada
Regions
Northern California
Waterways
unnamed tributary to Deer Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Nevada
Final Environmental Document Available at
CDFW regional office.
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No