California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 33 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04

128 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009091126
Lead Agency
California High Speed Rail Authority
Document Title
California High-Speed Train Project: Fresno to Bakersfield Major Amendment No. 33 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-024-04
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/21/2025
Document Description
The Project approved by CDFW consists of the ITP, Major Amendments Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Minor Amendment No. 4, Major Amendments Nos. 5-32 and this Major Amendment No. 33, as referenced above and as issued by CDFW, which addresses construction and operation of the Fresno to Bakersfield segment of the HST, as approved by the lead agency, affecting wildlife resources subject to to the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The ITP authorizes incidental take of the threatened California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), San Joaquin antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni), Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica); and the endangered Tipton kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides); and the candidate Western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea) (collectively, the Covered Species). The Project is expected to result in incidental take of blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila, BNLL) which is designated as endangered and as a fully protected species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). This Major Amendment No. 33 adds BNLL as a Covered Species subject to take authorization which will be impacted by Covered Activities; updates multiple Conditions of Approval to include BNLL and adds species-specific Conditions of Approval for BNLL; updates Table 9 to include Project related impacts to 255.30 acres of BNLL habitat updates Table 11 to include required compensatory Habitat Mitigation lands for BNLL, mitigation completed, and mitigation still outstanding which requires Performance Security; deletes Table 12 “Proposed Mitigation Sites” and adds Table 12 “Mitigation sites with Conservation Easements and documented species presence”; updates the Performance Security amount based on the Covered Species impacts still outstanding, adds a new Exhibit 9 BNLL Potential Habitat, updates to the Mitigation and Monitoring Reduction Plan (MMRP), and updates to the CESA Findings specific to BNLL. The Permittee has already permanently conserved 1,907.98 acres of high quality occupied BNLL habitat which has a monitoring program and an adaptive management plan, approved by CDFW to fully mitigate the impacts of the authorized take of BNLL.

Contact Information

Name
Javier Mendez
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Job Title
Sr. Environmental Scientist (Spec.)
Contact Types
Responsible Agency

Name
Stefan Galvez-Abadia
Agency Name
California High-Speed Rail Authority
Job Title
Director of Environmental Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Bakersfield, Fresno, Hanford, Shafter
Counties
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Tulare
Regions
Southern California
Other Location Info
The Project includes the California High Speed Train (HST) alignment beginning on the south side of the G Street and San Benito Street intersection, north of Highway 41, in the City of Fresno, Fresno County, California. From this intersection, the Fresno to Bakersfield HST alignment extends south either along or adjacent to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) for approximately 92 miles before reaching the section endpoint, at the intersection of Poplar Avenue and Madera Avenue, within the city limits of Shafter, in Kern County, California.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Attachments

Notice of Determination

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit LCI’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV New Search Print